Read More. Combatting pet overpopulation. Facts and stats. Have enacted animal cruelty laws that also include felony provisions since You can fight for ALL animals!
We're fighting against animal cruelty and neglect. Kathy Milani. The HSUS. To help you, your local shelter may have outreach programs, education materials, camps, etc. Every child is unique, and adults should use caution and careful thought when discussing cruelty with children. In general, children under four simply should not be exposed to cruelty.
Two-year-olds can begin to learn that their actions make others-including animals-happy and sad. With two- and three-year-olds, discuss their own experiences and how they would feel if they were treated the way they treat their pets or other animals in their immediate lives.
Help them relate not only the ways they would feel hurt, but also the ways they would feel happy. With all children under six or so, you may wish to help guide their hands so they can learn how to pet and hold their animal companions. Children do not have fine control over their movements and impulses—they will want to treat their pets with love, but will need a little help from you to do it correctly. Children who are between about four and six often begin to understand basic moral concepts, such as fairness.
Children may discuss injuries they have had themselves, but do not introduce discussions about other types of injuries. Try to limit discussions of animal cruelty to the simple fact that animals can be hurt; do not describe how they can be hurt e. With most children who are six to ten years old, you can begin to discuss why someone might be mean to an animal-as long as you make sure the child always keeps in mind that it is wrong to hurt animals.
In light of these effects, the law needs to do much more to regulate the agricultural industry, and the first step should be to criminalize cruelty to agricultural animals. This would force the industry to slow down production to more natural levels that are much less harmful to the environment. The agricultural industry has been incredibly successful at convincing legislatures and agencies to exempt farmers from regulation. These exemptions have an intuitive appeal because we envision a smalltime, sunscorched farmer putting on his mud boots before sunrise to go milk the cows and check on his fields, just as numerous generations did before him.
This type of farmer hardly seems like someone we need to regulate, so it is no wonder that society has chosen to exempt his activities. The problem, of course, is that the real beneficiaries of these exemptions are factory farms--the Wal-Marts of farming-- that run animals through assembly lines in an ongoing effort to maximize production.
Most smalltime farmers are already treating their animals well and therefore do not need an exemption from animal cruelty laws. Factory farms hire lobbyists and participate in agency rulemaking because they have by far the most to gain from an unregulated industry.
Unlike smalltime farmers, factory farms often fail to treat their animals with even minimal amounts of care. Indeed, factory farms are often called confined animal feeding operations. Rather than provide birds with additional space, factory farms often debeak birds--an incredibly painful process that is done without the aid of any anesthetic.
In this way, one cruel practice leads to another, and production continues to increase. Regulation scares factory farms because their practices undoubtedly violate any definition of cruelty to animals. It is impossible to treat animals humanely in a business that refuses to consider the interests of animals.
If they have to treat animals as the sentient beings that they are, production will surely decrease--a result that factory farms are unwilling to accept. While factory farms are keen on keeping production levels as high as possible, the rest of society would be much better off if we found ways to decrease production at these plants.
Although increased production usually benefits the economy, it is problematic in an industry--such as factory farming--that externalizes many of its costs and contributes to numerous environmental problems that affect human health and welfare. The unnaturally high production rates of factory farms have devastating effects on the environment, including hastening climate change, creating water quality and quantity problems, and destroying topsoil.
Livestock on factory farms currently play an enormous role in the climate change crisis. A recent United Nations study found that livestock account for eighteen percent of all greenhouse gas emissions.
Human beings should aim to treat animals in the way that is best for the animals concerned, where this does not conflict with what is best for human beings. This view says that it is morally wrong for human beings to be cruel to animals, and morally good for human beings to be kind to animals. Although this position isn't particularly clear intellectually, it works pretty well as a guide to the ethical treatment of animals. Animals can be used or exploited to benefit human beings as long as they are treated humanely in the process.
The less extreme position is that animals can be treated in any way that is not morally bad for human beings. For example, some people believe that it is wrong to be cruel to animals because it is wrong to be cruel.
Search term:.
0コメント