What if everyone was atheist




















Fortunately, some stars have come forward about being atheists or agnostics. Angelina Jolie When the Onion A.

Daniel Radcliffe The guy you love as Harry Potter is an unbeliever. Fifteen to twenty percent of all adult Americans have no religion. Among American religious groups, only Baptists and Roman Catholics have more adherents. Self-declared atheists account for less than 3 percent of the American population. Agnostics are under four percent. The actual figure may be millions higher. At the same time, most religions have held steady or lost members. The adults likeliest to have no religion are the youngest adults.

As many as 18 percent are agnostics. And the numbers seem to be rising. Vermont: More than one in four Vermonters and possibly more than one in three has no religion. New Hampshire: Almost as high a proportion of the faithless as Vermont. Maine: Nearly as big a percentage as New Hampshire. And finally, a two-way tie: Colorado and Nevada. A slightly lower percentage of unbelievers than the previous five states. You can find the faithless even in regions saturated with religion. North Carolina, for instance, is one of the most religious states.

But in the city of Durham, the faithless account for almost as high a percentage of the populace as they do in California or Montana. What about the rest of the world? The Ten Most Atheistic Countries Here are the nations that have particularly high numbers of unbelievers in their population.

Vietnam: As many as four out of five Vietnamese may be unbelievers. The Czech Republic: At least two out of five Czechs are godless.

Denmark: Nearly as high a percentage as the Czechs. France: More than a third of the population has no faith. Japan: Almost the same percentage as France. Norway: Almost the same percentage as Japan. Everyone became completely, completely atheist no agnosticism, no 'life force', no lip service to religion. It doesn't matter how that happened, or whether or not it's true- but if you must, assume that a bunch of people who'd been cryogenicaly frozen were brought back to life and all said there was no heaven, so a lot of people took that as proof that there is no God, and within 50 years, there was no more religion.

So what do you think would happen, now that everyone was atheist? Don't just limit yourself to the poll options- they're there only to get a general idea of what people think, and are vague for a reason. Joined: Dec 28, Messages: 10, Location: Nowhere. Maybe the formerly religious would commit more crimes, but I suspect not. I suspect the world would continue much the same as it is today, except perhaps with less socializing.

Afterall, part of being religious is being traditional, and what are traditions for other than bringing people together. Phlegmak , Dec 29, It would destroy a lot cultures because some religions and cultures are tied together like Judaism and Hinduism. It's not a good thing at all. And you can also be atheist and still believe in some aspects of religion like Buddhist philosophy or some other forms of spirituality.

The way I see it, I believe in a concrete, material world bounded by the laws of physics and also a supernatural world. I can't let either of them dominate my mind. It's about balance. I pity anyone who cannot broaden their mind to see different layers of the world. Bast , Dec 29, Joined: Jan 22, Messages: 4, Location: Fiftychat.

Tycoon , Dec 29, Joined: Sep 24, Messages: 13, I think some people need religion to survive, but the outome would be mostly good. Yoda Power , Dec 29, If we were to suddenly lose all feeling for spirituality, we'd probably move even more towards consumerism and materialism to keep ourselves happy, content, and balanced. Please support our research with a financial contribution.

It organizes the public into nine distinct groups, based on an analysis of their attitudes and values. Even in a polarized era, the survey reveals deep divisions in both partisan coalitions. Use this tool to compare the groups on some key topics and their demographics. Pew Research Center now uses as the last birth year for Millennials in our work. President Michael Dimock explains why.

About Pew Research Center Pew Research Center is a nonpartisan fact tank that informs the public about the issues, attitudes and trends shaping the world. It conducts public opinion polling, demographic research, media content analysis and other empirical social science research. Pew Research Center does not take policy positions.

System 2 evolved relatively recently. System 1, on the other hand, is intuitive, instinctual and automatic. These capabilities regularly develop in humans, regardless of where they are born. They are survival mechanisms. System 1 bestows us with an innate revulsion of rotting meat, allows us to speak our native language without thinking about it and gives babies the ability to recognise parents and distinguish between living and nonliving objects.

It makes us prone to looking for patterns to better understand our world, and to seek meaning for seemingly random events like natural disasters or the death of loved ones. In addition to helping us navigate the dangers of the world and find a mate, some scholars think that System 1 also enabled religions to evolve and perpetuate. Millennia ago, that tendency probably helped us avoid concealed danger, such as lions crouched in the grass or venomous snakes concealed in the bush.

But it also made us vulnerable to inferring the existence of invisible agents — whether they took the form of a benevolent god watching over us, an unappeased ancestor punishing us with a drought or a monster lurking in the shadows.

Similarly, System 1 encourages us to see things dualistically, meaning we have trouble thinking of the mind and body as a single unit.

This tendency emerges quite early: young children, regardless of their cultural background, are inclined to believe that they have an immortal soul — that their essence or personhood existed somewhere prior to their birth, and will always continue to exist.

This disposition easily assimilates into many existing religions, or — with a bit of creativity — lends itself to devising original constructs. Atheists must fight against all of that cultural and evolutionary baggage. Our minds crave purpose and explanation. Azerbaijani Muslims pray at the end of Ramadan Getty Images. On the other hand, science — the system of choice that many atheists and non-believers look to for understanding the natural world — is not an easy cognitive pill to swallow.

Science is about correcting System 1 biases, McCauley says.



0コメント

  • 1000 / 1000